Showing posts with label Jesus. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Jesus. Show all posts
Saturday, February 28, 2015
Sharing Statement March 1, 2015
Today our scripture came from the Gospel of Mark. Mark emphasizes Jesus' call to sacrifice by those who would follow him, and dwells on the Passion, Jesus' ultimate sacrifice. What does that mean for us? I believe it means giving sacrificially with our time, talent and treasure to see that God's will is accomplished on earth. This church is a good place to give your time, talent and treasure as we embark on a new vision for an old institution. Right now, we ask you to share your treasure.
Monday, April 29, 2013
Sequester and the Moral Failure of Congress
Last week Congress voted to end flight delays by voting more money for the FAA. This was a self-serving and a genuflect to the wealthy. I am appalled that while so many suffer Congress chose to act on that measure.
"Repealing the small part of sequestration that affected Congress itself and the donor class, while letting cancer patients go without chemotherapy, seniors go without meals on wheels, pregnant mothers go without nutritional assistance, and children get kicked out of Head Start programs, is a new low in our debased public morality." Fear of Flying: Cancer v. flight delays from the Washington Post.
I am a Christian. I have never believed we were meant to be a Christian Nation nor have we ever been one. The sequester confirms we are not one. I believe we are being judged by how we treat the least among us and we are abject failures.
Will we raise our voices for those sick with cancer, seniors without food, mothers without food for their babies, little children denied education because they are poor?
Will we raise our voices for the immigrant(the stranger), for the unjustly imprisoned, for the poor, and all who suffer needlessly in this nation of wealth?
Will Congress stand up for the least or grovel before their rich donors' Golden Calf?
Will we worship Mammon instead of God?
"Repealing the small part of sequestration that affected Congress itself and the donor class, while letting cancer patients go without chemotherapy, seniors go without meals on wheels, pregnant mothers go without nutritional assistance, and children get kicked out of Head Start programs, is a new low in our debased public morality." Fear of Flying: Cancer v. flight delays from the Washington Post.
I am a Christian. I have never believed we were meant to be a Christian Nation nor have we ever been one. The sequester confirms we are not one. I believe we are being judged by how we treat the least among us and we are abject failures.
Matthew 25: 31-46
The Judgement of the Nations
‘When the Son of Man comes in his glory, and all the angels with him, then he will sit on the throne of his glory. All the nations will be gathered before him, and he will separate people one from another as a shepherd separates the sheep from the goats, and he will put the sheep at his right hand and the goats at the left. Then the king will say to those at his right hand, “Come, you that are blessed by my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world; for I was hungry and you gave me food, I was thirsty and you gave me something to drink, I was a stranger and you welcomed me, I was naked and you gave me clothing, I was sick and you took care of me, I was in prison and you visited me.” Then the righteous will answer him, “Lord, when was it that we saw you hungry and gave you food, or thirsty and gave you something to drink? And when was it that we saw you a stranger and welcomed you, or naked and gave you clothing? And when was it that we saw you sick or in prison and visited you?” And the king will answer them, “Truly I tell you, just as you did it to one of the least of these who are members of my family, you did it to me.” Then he will say to those at his left hand, “You that are accursed, depart from me into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels; for I was hungry and you gave me no food, I was thirsty and you gave me nothing to drink, I was a stranger and you did not welcome me, naked and you did not give me clothing, sick and in prison and you did not visit me.” Then they also will answer, “Lord, when was it that we saw you hungry or thirsty or a stranger or naked or sick or in prison, and did not take care of you?” Then he will answer them, “Truly I tell you, just as you did not do it to one of the least of these, you did not do it to me.” And these will go away into eternal punishment, but the righteous into eternal life.
Will we raise our voices for those sick with cancer, seniors without food, mothers without food for their babies, little children denied education because they are poor?
Will we raise our voices for the immigrant(the stranger), for the unjustly imprisoned, for the poor, and all who suffer needlessly in this nation of wealth?
Will Congress stand up for the least or grovel before their rich donors' Golden Calf?
Will we worship Mammon instead of God?
Labels:
children,
Christian,
Christian nation,
Congress,
FAA,
flight delays,
God,
Golden Calf,
hungry,
immigrant,
Jesus,
Mammon,
Matthew 25:31-46,
politics,
poor,
religion,
sequester,
sick,
wealth
Monday, March 4, 2013
How Christians Will be Judged
The Bible passage below seems to be ignored by many conservative
Christians and Republicans as evidenced by their support of the sequester that shreds many services for the hungry, poor, homeless and
ill. If the United States were truly a Christian nation, the government would embody those that ministered to Jesus in Matthew 25:41-45.
On the day of judgment, Jesus will ask "Why did you not care for me when I was hungry, poor, homeless, disabled, and sick? Conservative Christians will answer, "We did not see you suffering like that in our neighborhoods." Then Jesus will answer, "I am everywhere in the world with the least of my people. In your nation, you elected representatives to cut all the programs funded by the federal government that would feed the hungry, aid the poor, help the handicapped, and provide medical care for the sick." Conservatives will answer, "The help would have come from the government, not us personally. We would help those next door." Jesus will answer, "Do you think I only want you to care for the person next door? Do I care if you help with your own hands or through the hands of others? I care for the least of these my brothers and sisters. When these least were hungry, struggled in despair with no money, wandered the streets of your great cities, and died alone in your parks; I starved, had no money to care for myself, slept under the bridges in your cities, and died alone in a homeless camp. 'Truly I say to you, to the extent that you did not do it to one of the least of these, you did not do it to Me.' "
On the day of judgment, Jesus will ask "Why did you not care for me when I was hungry, poor, homeless, disabled, and sick? Conservative Christians will answer, "We did not see you suffering like that in our neighborhoods." Then Jesus will answer, "I am everywhere in the world with the least of my people. In your nation, you elected representatives to cut all the programs funded by the federal government that would feed the hungry, aid the poor, help the handicapped, and provide medical care for the sick." Conservatives will answer, "The help would have come from the government, not us personally. We would help those next door." Jesus will answer, "Do you think I only want you to care for the person next door? Do I care if you help with your own hands or through the hands of others? I care for the least of these my brothers and sisters. When these least were hungry, struggled in despair with no money, wandered the streets of your great cities, and died alone in your parks; I starved, had no money to care for myself, slept under the bridges in your cities, and died alone in a homeless camp. 'Truly I say to you, to the extent that you did not do it to one of the least of these, you did not do it to Me.' "
Matthew 25:31-45
New American Standard Bible (NASB)The Judgment
31 “But when the Son of Man comes in His glory, and all the angels with Him, then He will sit on His glorious throne. 32 All the nations will be gathered before Him; and He will separate them from one another, as the shepherd separates the sheep from the goats; 33 and He will put the sheep on His right, and the goats on the left.
34 “Then the King will say to those on His right, ‘Come, you who are blessed of My Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world. 35 For I was hungry, and you gave Me something to eat; I was thirsty, and you gave Me something to drink; I was a stranger, and you invited Me in; 36 naked, and you clothed Me; I was sick, and you visited Me; I was in prison, and you came to Me.’ 37 Then the righteous will answer Him, ‘Lord, when did we see You hungry, and feed You, or thirsty, and give You something to drink? 38 And when did we see You a stranger, and invite You in, or naked, and clothe You? 39 When did we see You sick, or in prison, and come to You?’ 40 The King will answer and say to them, ‘Truly I say to you, to the extent that you did it to one of these brothers of Mine, even the least of them, you did it to Me.’
41 “Then He will also say to those on His left, ‘ Depart from Me, accursed ones, into the eternal fire which has been prepared for the devil and his angels; 42 for I was hungry, and you gave Me nothing to eat; I was thirsty, and you gave Me nothing to drink; 43 I was a stranger, and you did not invite Me in; naked, and you did not clothe Me; sick, and in prison, and you did not visit Me.’ 44 Then they themselves also will answer, ‘Lord, when did we see You hungry, or thirsty, or a stranger, or naked, or sick, or in prison, and did not [a]take care of You?’ 45 Then He will answer them, ‘Truly I say to you, to the extent that you did not do it to one of the least of these, you did not do it to Me.’
Labels:
Christian,
conservative,
faith,
goat,
goats,
government,
help,
Jesus,
judgment,
least,
Matthew 25:31-46,
neighbor,
religion,
Republican,
sheep
Thursday, February 21, 2013
Lectionary Musings for February 24, 2013
Luke 13:31-35
13:31 At that very hour some Pharisees came and said to him, "Get away from here, for Herod wants to kill you."
13:32 He said to them, "Go and tell that fox for me, 'Listen, I am casting out demons and performing cures today and tomorrow, and on the third day I finish my work.
13:33 Yet today, tomorrow, and the next day I must be on my way, because it is impossible for a prophet to be killed outside of Jerusalem.'
13:34 Jerusalem, Jerusalem, the city that kills the prophets and stones those who are sent to it! How often have I desired to gather your children together as a hen gathers her brood under her wings, and you were not willing!
13:35 See, your house is left to you. And I tell you, you will not see me until the time comes when you say, 'Blessed is the one who comes in the name of the Lord.'"
Jesus is on his way to Jerusalem, but at his own pace. He is in the area controlled by Herod Antipas when Pharisees come to warn him that Herod wants to kill him. The warning rings a little hollow when we contemplate Herod's actions when later Herod has the chance to kill Jesus. Herod sends him back to Pilate, not the actions of a man who has been waiting three months to kill Jesus (according to Luke's time table), Perhaps the Pharisees simply want to get Jesus away from their fiefdoms and think he will be afraid of a threat from Herod.
Jesus does not fear Herod. He does not even respect Herod calling him "that fox". He tells the Pharisees that he is busy caring for the least and will not move on until he has finished his work. The words"today and tomorrow, and on the third day" here and in the following verse just mean an indefinite period.
But Jesus has a purpose in his journey. That purpose is to die in Jerusalem. He makes that clear in his lament that the city kills the prophets and stones others. Yet, God has tried again and again to gather her chicks under her care, but they have refused to accept her love. The use of a feminine image reminds us that God is neither male nor female. This passage also reminds us that it is ultimately our choice to accept God's love or not.
The New Revised Standard Version translation of the beginning of verse 35 is not very enlightening. The New International Version translates that first sentence as "Look, your house is left to you desolate," House in this case refers to Jerusalem and reminds us that by rejecting Jesus as God Incarnate, Jerusalem is choosing to separate from God. Yet, God's love does not stop because we turn away. God is always the father waiting for the prodigal child to return.
Jesus quotes Psalm 118:26.giving us the last sentence of verse 35. That quote reminds us that a triumphal entrance into Jerusalem awaits Jesus on Palm Sunday. Christians today see that Psalm 118 as a messianic psalm. At the time of its writing, this verse applied to the king's entrance into the temple. Jesus knows what is coming: celebration, death and triumph. Jesus is in control. God will choose the place and time.
Labels:
chicks,
Christianity,
death,
February 24,
feminine,
hen,
Herod,
Jerusalem,
Jesus,
kill,
lectionary,
Luke 13:31-35,
NSRV,
Palm Sunday,
Pharisees,
prophet,
Psalm 118,
religion
Friday, January 25, 2013
Lectionary Musings for January 27, 2013
14Then Jesus, filled with the power of the Spirit, returned to Galilee, and a report about him spread through all the surrounding country. 15He began to teach in their synagogues and was praised by everyone. 16When he came to Nazareth, where he had been brought up, he went to the synagogue on the sabbath day, as was his custom. He stood up to read, 17and the scroll of the prophet Isaiah was given to him. He unrolled the scroll and found the place where it was written: 18“The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, because he has anointed me to bring good news to the poor. He has sent me to proclaim release to the captives and recovery of sight to the blind, to let the oppressed go free, 19to proclaim the year of the Lord’s favor.” 20And he rolled up the scroll, gave it back to the attendant, and sat down. The eyes of all in the synagogue were fixed on him. 21Then he began to say to them, “Today this scripture has been fulfilled in your hearing.”
![]() |
Ruins of Sepphoris |
This week's lectionary reading in Luke's gospel finds us in Chapter 4. Jesus returns to the synagogue of his youth and reads from the writings of the prophet Isaiah. The passage he chooses may well have been written about Isaiah himself. Now, Jesus applies them to himself and they take on new meaning.
His focus will not be on the religious whom he sits among. His focus will be on the poor, those that are not full participants in their faith. Jesus will make them valued members of his faith and recipients of his all encompassing love.
He will seek those who cannot seek him: the captives, the blind, the oppressed. To them, he will proclaim the love of God.
He claims ownership of this passage and proclaims himself God's anointed. He does not claim to be the Messiah yet. This is the opening of his ministry. He is setting the stage for the revelation of divinity that is to come.
Why would he choose to make this proclamation in Nazareth? Nazareth, where he grew up, was a small village of Jews. However, Nazareth was adjacent to a new city, Sepphoris. Sepphoris had been rebuilt by Herod Antipas after it was destroyed by the Romans in 4 BCE. By the time of Jesus it was a bustling city whose population was much influenced by Rome. Perhaps Jesus intended for his words to go beyond the boundaries of Nazareth to Sepphoris.
Those that frequented the synagogue in Nazareth may well have frequented the ten synagogues in Sepphoris. Having grown up in the area and worked in Sepphoris, Jesus would know that what was said in Nazareth would spread to Sepphoris. In a subtle way, Jesus is announcing himself not just to Jews but also to Romans.
Jesus tells those that hear him that the world is changing, that a new force has entered into both the world of Jews and the world of the Romans. There is no fanfare, but God's good news is seeping into the world. Drop by drop hearts will be changed.
Labels:
blind,
captives,
Christianity,
God,
Holy Spirit,
Isaiah,
Isaiah 61:1-2,
Jesus,
Jew,
Luke 4:14-21,
Nazareth,
oppressed.,
poor,
prophet,
religion,
Roman,
Sepphoris,
synagogue
Thursday, January 10, 2013
Lectionary Musings for January 13, 2013
I have decided to bring a little discipline to my religious life.by musing on one of the lectionary readings for the coming Sunday. Yes, I now belong to a church that follows a three year cycle of readings from the Bible. As a Southern Baptist reject, I have found these readings to be surprisingly comforting. My musings today will be on Luke 3:15-17, 21-22, labeled by commentators as the baptism of Jesus.
Why did Jesus have to be baptized? I know scholars can provide answers. I suspect that in the past I had explored the question either on my own or in a study group setting, but no glib answers spring to mind.
We know some people were confused and thought John the Baptist was the Messiah. Even John's own denial may not have stopped their belief in him. Jesus knew he was the Messiah, but he does not wish to announce it to the world. He is content to let the confusion continue for a while. This will give him time to call his disciples and begin the long, circuitous death march to Jerusalem. I think with his baptism Jesus is announcing the beginning of his ministry to God.
One oddity in Luke's narrative is that John is arrested and thrown into jail before Jesus is baptized. I had never noticed this because all the narratives of Jesus baptism have long since blurred into one preferred story in my mind. A commentator called my attention to this strange glitch in Luke's story of Jesus' baptism. If John is in jail, who baptizes Jesus? God, the Creator.
By going to the place of baptism, Jesus announces his intention to become the God that has always been within, the God submerged within the human until this time. Now that divinity will be free and fully engaged in the world around him.
Jesus prays, heaven opens and the "Holy Spirit descended upon him in bodily form like a dove. And a voice came from heaven, "You are my Son, the Beloved, with you I am well pleased."" Here for me is the Trinity: Creator, Holy Spirit, and Word.
In the beginning, the Trinity is one. The Holy Spirit (Love) is the binder between Creator and Word as the universe is spoken into existence. In choosing to be born of a woman, the bond was not severed, but I believe it must have been stretched. How could it not have been as the Word of God was poured into a vessel as limited as a human being?
At baptism, Jesus acknowledges who and what he is. The Holy Spirit descends and binds Creator and Word together. The Trinity is whole. Jesus will show us God in human form linked by Love to the Creator.
How does this passage speak to me? It reminds me that Jesus made a conscious commitment to pursue the purpose God had set for him. I believe that we are confronted at some point with existence of God, just as Jesus was confronted at his baptism by the Creator. When does this happen? At different times, in different ways, with different concepts of God. Then and only then are we required to make a choice. We can choose to become some small part of God's plan, God's being, or God's eternity, but it is our choice and I believe it comes for everyone on this planet.
For me, this choice came at age 29. I had received a doctorate in chemistry at age 25 and was actively engaged in science. I was a confirmed deist, not attending any church and not interested in doing so. I had been told as a child by Sunday School teachers and ministers that Christians did not ask questions about God or about our faith. Any faith that did not like questions was not for me. After age 13, I never attended a church of any kind again.
As the years passed, I did feel I was missing something in my life. I began a totally unsystematic study of various faiths minus Christianity, of course. I also made random attempts at finding some volunteer opportunities (none religious) where I could be of service. Nothing seemed to fit.
I was a voracious reader. I had enjoyed C. S. Lewis' Narnia series as a child. Now, I read his science fiction trilogy. I was a little put off by the obvious religious overtones, but I enjoyed all three books. Looking for more by him, I read The Screwtape Letters. Suddenly, there was more to Christianity than I had believed. I decided perhaps I should see if there was an intellectual side to Christianity afterall.
I made a choice and joined a liberal Baptist church with an engaging minister who presented short messages that challenged you to think. At the same time, I joined a study group led by a doctoral candidate in philosophy. Both the minister and the study group made me realize that Christianity was a faith of the intellect as well as the soul. I could ask all the questions I wanted. So when I was asked to be a deacon, I said yes to serving and yes to God. My choice was to believe.
As a Christian I met a God who revealed herself in the Bible as Creator, Love and Word. Now that Love came to me as the Comforter, the Holy Spirit. There was no speaking in tongues, no tongues of fire. no overwhelming emotion. Just a quiet assurance that I had found my way.
Jesus was a year older than I was when he made his choice. Perhaps the message of his baptism is that even if one committed oneself to God as a child (remember Jesus in the temple at 12), adulthood demands a fresh decision. Choose.
Why did Jesus have to be baptized? I know scholars can provide answers. I suspect that in the past I had explored the question either on my own or in a study group setting, but no glib answers spring to mind.
We know some people were confused and thought John the Baptist was the Messiah. Even John's own denial may not have stopped their belief in him. Jesus knew he was the Messiah, but he does not wish to announce it to the world. He is content to let the confusion continue for a while. This will give him time to call his disciples and begin the long, circuitous death march to Jerusalem. I think with his baptism Jesus is announcing the beginning of his ministry to God.
One oddity in Luke's narrative is that John is arrested and thrown into jail before Jesus is baptized. I had never noticed this because all the narratives of Jesus baptism have long since blurred into one preferred story in my mind. A commentator called my attention to this strange glitch in Luke's story of Jesus' baptism. If John is in jail, who baptizes Jesus? God, the Creator.
By going to the place of baptism, Jesus announces his intention to become the God that has always been within, the God submerged within the human until this time. Now that divinity will be free and fully engaged in the world around him.
Jesus prays, heaven opens and the "Holy Spirit descended upon him in bodily form like a dove. And a voice came from heaven, "You are my Son, the Beloved, with you I am well pleased."" Here for me is the Trinity: Creator, Holy Spirit, and Word.
In the beginning, the Trinity is one. The Holy Spirit (Love) is the binder between Creator and Word as the universe is spoken into existence. In choosing to be born of a woman, the bond was not severed, but I believe it must have been stretched. How could it not have been as the Word of God was poured into a vessel as limited as a human being?
At baptism, Jesus acknowledges who and what he is. The Holy Spirit descends and binds Creator and Word together. The Trinity is whole. Jesus will show us God in human form linked by Love to the Creator.
How does this passage speak to me? It reminds me that Jesus made a conscious commitment to pursue the purpose God had set for him. I believe that we are confronted at some point with existence of God, just as Jesus was confronted at his baptism by the Creator. When does this happen? At different times, in different ways, with different concepts of God. Then and only then are we required to make a choice. We can choose to become some small part of God's plan, God's being, or God's eternity, but it is our choice and I believe it comes for everyone on this planet.
For me, this choice came at age 29. I had received a doctorate in chemistry at age 25 and was actively engaged in science. I was a confirmed deist, not attending any church and not interested in doing so. I had been told as a child by Sunday School teachers and ministers that Christians did not ask questions about God or about our faith. Any faith that did not like questions was not for me. After age 13, I never attended a church of any kind again.
As the years passed, I did feel I was missing something in my life. I began a totally unsystematic study of various faiths minus Christianity, of course. I also made random attempts at finding some volunteer opportunities (none religious) where I could be of service. Nothing seemed to fit.
I was a voracious reader. I had enjoyed C. S. Lewis' Narnia series as a child. Now, I read his science fiction trilogy. I was a little put off by the obvious religious overtones, but I enjoyed all three books. Looking for more by him, I read The Screwtape Letters. Suddenly, there was more to Christianity than I had believed. I decided perhaps I should see if there was an intellectual side to Christianity afterall.
I made a choice and joined a liberal Baptist church with an engaging minister who presented short messages that challenged you to think. At the same time, I joined a study group led by a doctoral candidate in philosophy. Both the minister and the study group made me realize that Christianity was a faith of the intellect as well as the soul. I could ask all the questions I wanted. So when I was asked to be a deacon, I said yes to serving and yes to God. My choice was to believe.
As a Christian I met a God who revealed herself in the Bible as Creator, Love and Word. Now that Love came to me as the Comforter, the Holy Spirit. There was no speaking in tongues, no tongues of fire. no overwhelming emotion. Just a quiet assurance that I had found my way.
Jesus was a year older than I was when he made his choice. Perhaps the message of his baptism is that even if one committed oneself to God as a child (remember Jesus in the temple at 12), adulthood demands a fresh decision. Choose.
Monday, August 20, 2012
A Christian Response to the Conservative Mantra, No Help Through Government
The Bible passage below seems to be ignored by many conservative Christians, and Republicans in the House as evidenced by their vote for the Ryan budget that shreds services for the hungry, poor, homeless and ill. I fear this is the budget that Romney will inflict on this nation if elected. I would offer my own updated version of Matthew 25:41-45.
On the day of judgment, Jesus will ask "Why did you not care for me when I was hungry, poor, homeless, disabled, and sick? Conservative Christians will answer, "We did not see you suffering like that in our neighborhoods." Then Jesus will answer, "I am everywhere in the world with the least of my people. In your nation, you elected representatives to cut all the programs funded by the federal government that would feed the hungry, aid the poor, help the handicapped, and provide medical care for the sick. Conservatives will answer, "The help would have come from the government, not us personally. We would help those next door." Jesus will answer, "Do you think I only want you to care for the person next door? Do I care if you help with your own hands or through the hands of others? I care for the least of these my brothers and sisters. When these least were hungry, struggled in despair with no money, wandered the streets of your great cities, and died alone in your parks, I starved, had no money to care for myself or my family, slept under the bridges in your cities, and died alone in a homeless camp. 'Truly I say to you, to the extent that you did not do it to one of the least of these, you did not do it to Me.' "
On the day of judgment, Jesus will ask "Why did you not care for me when I was hungry, poor, homeless, disabled, and sick? Conservative Christians will answer, "We did not see you suffering like that in our neighborhoods." Then Jesus will answer, "I am everywhere in the world with the least of my people. In your nation, you elected representatives to cut all the programs funded by the federal government that would feed the hungry, aid the poor, help the handicapped, and provide medical care for the sick. Conservatives will answer, "The help would have come from the government, not us personally. We would help those next door." Jesus will answer, "Do you think I only want you to care for the person next door? Do I care if you help with your own hands or through the hands of others? I care for the least of these my brothers and sisters. When these least were hungry, struggled in despair with no money, wandered the streets of your great cities, and died alone in your parks, I starved, had no money to care for myself or my family, slept under the bridges in your cities, and died alone in a homeless camp. 'Truly I say to you, to the extent that you did not do it to one of the least of these, you did not do it to Me.' "
![]() |
photo by kkirugi |
Matthew 25:31-45
New American Standard Bible (NASB)The Judgment
31 “But when the Son of Man comes in His glory, and all the angels with Him, then He will sit on His glorious throne. 32 All the nations will be gathered before Him; and He will separate them from one another, as the shepherd separates the sheep from the goats; 33 and He will put the sheep on His right, and the goats on the left.
34 “Then the King will say to those on His right, ‘Come, you who are blessed of My Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world. 35 For I was hungry, and you gave Me something to eat; I was thirsty, and you gave Me something to drink; I was a stranger, and you invited Me in; 36 naked, and you clothed Me; I was sick, and you visited Me; I was in prison, and you came to Me.’ 37 Then the righteous will answer Him, ‘Lord, when did we see You hungry, and feed You, or thirsty, and give You something to drink? 38 And when did we see You a stranger, and invite You in, or naked, and clothe You? 39 When did we see You sick, or in prison, and come to You?’ 40 The King will answer and say to them, ‘Truly I say to you, to the extent that you did it to one of these brothers of Mine, even the least of them, you did it to Me.’
41 “Then He will also say to those on His left, ‘ Depart from Me, accursed ones, into the eternal fire which has been prepared for the devil and his angels; 42 for I was hungry, and you gave Me nothing to eat; I was thirsty, and you gave Me nothing to drink; 43 I was a stranger, and you did not invite Me in; naked, and you did not clothe Me; sick, and in prison, and you did not visit Me.’ 44 Then they themselves also will answer, ‘Lord, when did we see You hungry, or thirsty, or a stranger, or naked, or sick, or in prison, and did not [a]take care of You?’ 45 Then He will answer them, ‘Truly I say to you, to the extent that you did not do it to one of the least of these, you did not do it to Me.’
Labels:
Christian,
faith,
goat,
government,
help,
Jesus,
judgment,
least,
Matthew 25:31-46,
religion,
Republican,
sheep
Wednesday, February 22, 2012
Abortion is the Issue
Most of my family and many of my friends are conservative evangelicals. That is a function of where I live: a state where Southern Baptists predominate. Sad to say, most are one issue voters and that issue is abortion because their church tells them you are not a Christian if you do not want the government to end legal abortions. I belonged to evangelical church for many years, even though I was a liberal Christian. My evangelical church narrowed its beliefs until there was no place for me. Evangelicals in general seemed to me to have become less accepting. I moved to another denomination where my views are accepted, but not necessarily believed by all.
I do not know when a clump of cells changes to a person. I personally would never have had an abortion unless my life was in danger. At my age now, the question is moot. At some point in a pregnancy, I believe it is morally wrong to terminate the pregnancy because the fetus has acquired a soul. However, I do not believe I have the right to impose my personal belief about abortion on others. I certainly do not believe that the government has any right to impose anyone's religious beliefs about abortion on others. I am pro-choice and anti-government interference.
Conservative evangelicals ignore the science of biology. Theirs is an anti-intellectual mindset. From their viewpoint, a fertilized egg has acquired a soul and therefore should not be destroyed. Never mind that studies have shown that over 70% of all fertilized eggs do not implant during a woman's lifetime. I do not think that God is wasting 70% of all souls. The God I know is not so capricious.

Abortion is the single issue that always determines how conservative evangelicals vote. If the abortion stance of all the candidates is the same, then conservative evangelicals will choose who to vote for on the basis of other issues. Evangelicals will knowingly vote against their own economic self-interests to choose a candidate who is anti-abortion. I do not think that will change in 2012.
Wednesday, December 14, 2011
Could Jesus Vote in 2012?
Many states have enacted a law to require a photo ID before you can vote. Republicans say a photo ID prevents voter fraud, but statistics show that voter fraud is almost nonexistent. The true purpose of a voter ID law is to disenfranchise the old, the poor and the disabled; all of whom would not vote as Republicans want.
Why do I believe this?
Because I was raised in Texas and remember the poll tax. My Yankee grandmother moved to Texas with my native Texan mother after WWII. My grandmother was shocked to discover she had to pay to vote. I can remember my mother explaining the pernicious nature of the poll tax. The poll tax was designed to keep the poor and especially African Americans from voting. The poll tax was successful.
The 24th amendment to the constitution of the United States was passed to end the poll tax. President Lyndon Johnson said, "There can be no one too poor to vote." Republicans want to put lie to that.
Now, to vote you will need a driver's license or state photo ID to vote. Proponents of the Voter ID law say that these ID's are now free. These ID's are not available at the corner grocer. You must be able to go to your local driver's license office and wait a considerable length of time to have your photo taken for the ID. If you are old, infirm or poor, especially if you don't have a car, this becomes a daunting task. Just as in the past, when the poll tax could only be purchased in the courthouse downtown, now the modern poll tax will be just as hard to access for the portion of the population that Republicans want to disenfranchise.
Many of the disenfranchised may lack the documentation necessary to get a photo ID. In one Wisconsin case, an elderly woman who has voted for years and served in public office lacks the proper documentation and will have to go to court to get it at considerable cost. My own paternal grandmother did not have a birth certificate because she was born on a farm in rural Wisconsin.
Jesus told us that "whatever you did not do for one of the least of these, you did not do for me". When we deprive the poor, the disabled, the ex-convict ,the elderly of the right to vote, we deprive Jesus. In 2012, could Jesus vote in your state?.
Why do I believe this?
Because I was raised in Texas and remember the poll tax. My Yankee grandmother moved to Texas with my native Texan mother after WWII. My grandmother was shocked to discover she had to pay to vote. I can remember my mother explaining the pernicious nature of the poll tax. The poll tax was designed to keep the poor and especially African Americans from voting. The poll tax was successful.
The 24th amendment to the constitution of the United States was passed to end the poll tax. President Lyndon Johnson said, "There can be no one too poor to vote." Republicans want to put lie to that.
Now, to vote you will need a driver's license or state photo ID to vote. Proponents of the Voter ID law say that these ID's are now free. These ID's are not available at the corner grocer. You must be able to go to your local driver's license office and wait a considerable length of time to have your photo taken for the ID. If you are old, infirm or poor, especially if you don't have a car, this becomes a daunting task. Just as in the past, when the poll tax could only be purchased in the courthouse downtown, now the modern poll tax will be just as hard to access for the portion of the population that Republicans want to disenfranchise.
![]() |
Photo by Dan Young Wausau Daily Herald |
Jesus told us that "whatever you did not do for one of the least of these, you did not do for me". When we deprive the poor, the disabled, the ex-convict ,the elderly of the right to vote, we deprive Jesus. In 2012, could Jesus vote in your state?.
Monday, July 25, 2011
Proving We Are Not A Christian Nation
Conservative Christians, who believe the United States was chosen by the one, true God to be his nation founded on God's principles, ignore Christ's summation of the law and the prophets in order to become Republicans. These Republicans daily demonstrate to the world we are not a Christian nation as they focus on money not people. If they win the debt ceiling crisis by destroying Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid, they will have definitively proved that our government is free of any divine direction.
Christ said that there were two commands that summed up all of God's teachings. Love God and love your neighbor as yourself. When asked who is your neighbor, Jesus told the parable of the Good Samaritan. In it, a Samaritan (Jews despised Samaritans at the time) helps a man that has been mugged and robbed. The man is a total stranger. The Samaritan cares for the man, then pays for his future care. He tells those caring for the injured man that he will check to see they have carried out his wishes.
What can be clearer? Christians are to take care of the strangers in our midst who have been attacked by forces outside their control. Christians are not to just take care of them personally if they can, but to see that strangers are cared for. Christians are to check on the stranger's continued welfare. In a modern society of millions, how can Christians do this? Christians can enable a surrogate to act for them. The government becomes our Good Samaritan.
Republicans do not believe in the Good Samaritan. I have been repeatedly told that they have no obligation to help anyone outside their immediate family. That they have no obligation to help those who cannot help themselves. To the contrary, the Republicans consider those that cannot help themselves defective and a drag on society: they should be abandoned.
Those Republicans who call themselves Christians hold those same views. One such person in my own church told me that a member of our church who had taken in his grandchildren should not have done so. That church member should have saved the money he spent taking care of grandchildren so when his health failed he could take care of himself and not ask the church for help. ( He had asked for help. The church did not help. I no longer attend that church.)
Time and again, so-called Christians have written that they will not help people who do not work. These Christians assume that those not working don't because they are lazy. Interestingly, when Jesus talks about judgment, he does not say we should check on why a person was hungry, why they are sick, or why they are in prison. Jesus says feed them, take care of them and visit them if you want God to claim you as his own. Republicans have become the goats described in Matthew 25:31-47, turned away by God on judgment day.
With the Republicans dominating the political debate and Democrats cravenly acquiescing to their outrageous demands, this nation is in retreat from any notion of caring for the least among us. Republicans that call themselves Christian have made being poor a sin. They believe Christians have no obligation to help sinners. Republicans of all types have abandoned Christ's command to love your neighbor. How can our government abandon Christ's command and our country remain a Christian nation?
We are not a Christian nation. We should not be. Our founders saw this nation as encompassing all who were citizens regardless of faith. That is why we have the Bill of Rights: to keep the majority from abusing the minority: to keep Christians from abusing non-Christians.
Those that scream the loudest that we are a Christian nation refuse to follow Christ's command to love your neighbor. Today, they would shred the social safety net by cutting Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid. Those that profess to be today's only true Christians only love themselves.
Republicans tell us we are to concentrate on money not the well-being of our citizens. Most Republicans have looked around and said, "I have no neighbors except the wealthy." Even Democrats are falling for that line. Soon, our government will be of money, by money and for money. Christ said that "You cannot serve both God and Money." If Christians who are Republicans choose money over people, then they do not serve God. By conservative Christians own choosing, we will not be a Christian nation.
Christ said that there were two commands that summed up all of God's teachings. Love God and love your neighbor as yourself. When asked who is your neighbor, Jesus told the parable of the Good Samaritan. In it, a Samaritan (Jews despised Samaritans at the time) helps a man that has been mugged and robbed. The man is a total stranger. The Samaritan cares for the man, then pays for his future care. He tells those caring for the injured man that he will check to see they have carried out his wishes.
What can be clearer? Christians are to take care of the strangers in our midst who have been attacked by forces outside their control. Christians are not to just take care of them personally if they can, but to see that strangers are cared for. Christians are to check on the stranger's continued welfare. In a modern society of millions, how can Christians do this? Christians can enable a surrogate to act for them. The government becomes our Good Samaritan.
Republicans do not believe in the Good Samaritan. I have been repeatedly told that they have no obligation to help anyone outside their immediate family. That they have no obligation to help those who cannot help themselves. To the contrary, the Republicans consider those that cannot help themselves defective and a drag on society: they should be abandoned.
Those Republicans who call themselves Christians hold those same views. One such person in my own church told me that a member of our church who had taken in his grandchildren should not have done so. That church member should have saved the money he spent taking care of grandchildren so when his health failed he could take care of himself and not ask the church for help. ( He had asked for help. The church did not help. I no longer attend that church.)
Time and again, so-called Christians have written that they will not help people who do not work. These Christians assume that those not working don't because they are lazy. Interestingly, when Jesus talks about judgment, he does not say we should check on why a person was hungry, why they are sick, or why they are in prison. Jesus says feed them, take care of them and visit them if you want God to claim you as his own. Republicans have become the goats described in Matthew 25:31-47, turned away by God on judgment day.
With the Republicans dominating the political debate and Democrats cravenly acquiescing to their outrageous demands, this nation is in retreat from any notion of caring for the least among us. Republicans that call themselves Christian have made being poor a sin. They believe Christians have no obligation to help sinners. Republicans of all types have abandoned Christ's command to love your neighbor. How can our government abandon Christ's command and our country remain a Christian nation?
We are not a Christian nation. We should not be. Our founders saw this nation as encompassing all who were citizens regardless of faith. That is why we have the Bill of Rights: to keep the majority from abusing the minority: to keep Christians from abusing non-Christians.
Those that scream the loudest that we are a Christian nation refuse to follow Christ's command to love your neighbor. Today, they would shred the social safety net by cutting Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid. Those that profess to be today's only true Christians only love themselves.
Republicans tell us we are to concentrate on money not the well-being of our citizens. Most Republicans have looked around and said, "I have no neighbors except the wealthy." Even Democrats are falling for that line. Soon, our government will be of money, by money and for money. Christ said that "You cannot serve both God and Money." If Christians who are Republicans choose money over people, then they do not serve God. By conservative Christians own choosing, we will not be a Christian nation.
Wednesday, March 23, 2011
Could Jesus Vote in Texas?
![]() |
Photo by pncsmith |
Why do I believe this?
Because I was raised in Texas and remember the poll tax. My Yankee grandmother moved to Texas with my native Texan mother after WWII. My grandmother was shocked to discover she had to pay to vote. I can remember my mother explaining the pernicious nature of the poll tax. The poll tax was designed to keep the poor and especially African Americans from voting. The poll tax was successful.
The 24th amendment to the constitution of the United States was passed to end the poll tax. President Lyndon Johnson, a Texan, said, "There can be no one too poor to vote." The Texas Senate is determined to put lie to that. Voter identification is a Republican scam to reduce the number of voters more likely to vote Democratic.
Now, to vote you will need a driver's license or state photo ID to vote. This means you must be able to pay for those documents. In addition, you must be able to go to your local driver's license office and wait a considerable length of time to have your photo taken. If you are old, infirm or poor, especially if you don't have a car, this becomes a daunting task. Just as in the past, when the poll tax could only be purchased in the courthouse downtown, now the modern poll tax will be just as hard to access for the portion of the population that the majority of our Senate want to disenfranchise.
Texans should be ashamed, but like their senators, too many would rather not see these people vote. "Afterall, if these people were fit to vote, they could get an ID, " is now the mantra.
Jesus said what we do to the least of these, we do to Him. Could Jesus vote in Texas?
Labels:
24th,
caucus,
constitution,
Democrat,
House,
Jesus,
legislature,
Matthew 25:40,
politics,
poll tax,
Republican,
senate,
sham,
texas,
vote
Wednesday, February 17, 2010
Proposition 1 on the March 2, 2010 Ballot
The Texas Republican party has placed five propositions on their March 2, 2010, primary ballot. These propositions are non-binding. The propositions are not amendments to the Texas Constitution.
The first proposition is as follows:
Ballot Proposition #1: Photo ID
The Texas legislature should make it a priority to protect the integrity of our election process by enacting legislation that requires voters to provide valid photo identification in order to cast a ballot in any and all elections conducted in the State of Texas.
YES or NO
I wrote about this previously in this blog when the legislature considered making people get a photo ID to vote. See Could Jesus Vote in Texas?
A Brown University study cataloged the negative effects of the introduction of photo ID's. The following is the last paragraph in their study.
If you vote for Proposition 1, you are voting for suppression. This proposition is designed to elicit a yes vote that will be used to further the Republican position on voter suppression. Republicans know that those most affected are the elderly, the disabled, and minorities; people most likely to vote Democratic. Anything that can be done to reduce their numbers aids Republican candidates.
Let's recall Texas sad history of voter suppression. It was called the poll tax and was designed to suppress the black vote. Obviously, the desire to suppress the vote of non-whites still exists. The tea-baggers have openly called for literacy tests. Tests used in the South to keep blacks from voting. I expect Republicans to embrace that position.

I go into detail how needing a photo ID discourages the least among us from voting in my article Could Jesus Vote in Texas?
I will paraphrase Jesus. "I tell you the truth. You kept the least of these from voting, so you kept me from voting.."
The first proposition is as follows:
Ballot Proposition #1: Photo ID
The Texas legislature should make it a priority to protect the integrity of our election process by enacting legislation that requires voters to provide valid photo identification in order to cast a ballot in any and all elections conducted in the State of Texas.
YES or NO
I wrote about this previously in this blog when the legislature considered making people get a photo ID to vote. See Could Jesus Vote in Texas?
A Brown University study cataloged the negative effects of the introduction of photo ID's. The following is the last paragraph in their study.
"In 2004, despite higher white registration levels in voter ID states, the net effect was a substantial reduction in voter turnout. The reduction cut across racial and ethnic lines, but disproportionately affected blacks and Hispanics. It also disproportionately diminished electoral participation by citizens with lower income and education, tenants, and people who move more frequently. These groups already stand out for lower participation, and voter ID has the consequence of further reducing their engagement with the electoral system. In our view the selectivity of these suppressive impacts is their most objectionable feature. But even aside from placing a greater burden on some groups than on others, this is a policy that has not been shown to have any benefits. If reversing this policy in the 20 states that implemented it in 2004 could have increased overall turnout by registered voters by 1.6 million — from a rate of 67.7% to 70.3% — that is a strong argument in itself."The Texas Attorney has spent $1.4 million in 2 years to find 26 cases of voter fraud. He uncovered no grand fraud schemes. Most of these cases involved technical infractions where someone carried a properly marked mail-in ballot to the mailbox for elderly people. What a dastardly crime! I suppose Attorney General Abbott will prosecute me if I take my 85 year old aunt's sealed ballot to the mailbox in her apartment complex. That is what we are talking about. In addition, Abbott only prosecutes Democrats by the way. He ignores Republican misteps.
If you vote for Proposition 1, you are voting for suppression. This proposition is designed to elicit a yes vote that will be used to further the Republican position on voter suppression. Republicans know that those most affected are the elderly, the disabled, and minorities; people most likely to vote Democratic. Anything that can be done to reduce their numbers aids Republican candidates.
Let's recall Texas sad history of voter suppression. It was called the poll tax and was designed to suppress the black vote. Obviously, the desire to suppress the vote of non-whites still exists. The tea-baggers have openly called for literacy tests. Tests used in the South to keep blacks from voting. I expect Republicans to embrace that position.

I go into detail how needing a photo ID discourages the least among us from voting in my article Could Jesus Vote in Texas?
I will paraphrase Jesus. "I tell you the truth. You kept the least of these from voting, so you kept me from voting.."
VOTE "NO" ON PROPOSITION ONE!
Labels:
1,
ballot,
Jesus,
March 2,
Matthew 25:45,
One,
politics,
poll tax,
primary,
proposition,
Republican,
texas,
vote
Friday, January 22, 2010
Baptists Shoot Their Wounded
My therapist has been pushing me to write about what is going on in my life. I don't(won't) keep a diary, so this is a close as I will get. My therapist (Sweets after the psychologist on Bones) tells me I should react with anger to what has happened to me in the last year. That I was hurt, but not angry, worries him.
First, some background. Over a year ago, I was extremely depressed, so I did what seemed the only logical thing to do: I tried to kill myself. I only failed because a friend found me in time and got me to the hospital. My suicide attempt may have been a side effect of a painkiller that I was taking because a bone in my leg was dying or a result of the depression. My friends all want the attempt to be from the painkiller. Since I still have suicidal thoughts I am not so sure the painkiller was the problem. Certainly, it did not help. My life had collapsed around me, I won't go into details, just say they were financial, emotional, and spiritual.
The dying bone has been replaced by metal. I take a powerful anti-depressant. I see Sweets at least monthly. I still find the desire to kill myself there most of the time. For a while, I had reached the point where I wanted to die, but not to kill myself, but my Baptist friends have sent me back to daily suicide contemplation. I just see no point to my life. I still believe in God, but I have doubts that the individual's fate in this world matters in God's grand scheme. I have no doubt that I will go to heaven and I would rather be there than here.
I belong to a moderate Baptist church and have attended the same Sunday School class for over twenty years. I thought I was part of that group. I was the most liberal member of the class, but my opinions had always been welcomed and I thought, respected.
The class responded wonderfully to my bone surgery and recuperation. They bought my groceries for more that two months as I recovered from the surgery. Of course, I battled the depression and a few friends and a cousin kept a close eye on me. No one from my class ever mentioned it, even though I had not kept my problem a secret. When my recuperation from the surgery was complete, I received a shock. My help stopped. I was told that the class would do no more and handed a list of food pantries. I was so grateful, but stunned at the abrupt withdrawal of support. I was working some, but not bringing in enough to support myself or my cats. I believe the fact that I owned a bunch of cats contributed to the desire not to help me. I was worse off than when I attempted suicide in every way but physical pain.
I saw no way to take care of myself or my cats. I decided that suicide was still the only answer to my emotional and financial pain. I would take steps to make sure I was not found in time. I have never felt so alone in my whole life.
A friend called and asked me to lunch. I don't know what she said at that lunch, but I broke down and told her how bad my circumstances were. I did not tell her that I was planning suicide. She responded magnificently, giving me enough money to get on my feet and pay my income tax. She has continued to be there for me. The irony is she is an ex-Mormon who attends no church. My Baptist friends did not even ask how I was doing.
A member of my class did call and said she wanted to help. She was a trained social worker and said she had contacts that could help. She promised me that anything I told her would be kept in confidence. She lied.
I told way too much about what was going on in my life including a brief synopsis of my childhood. What a fool I was. I thought if I shared my pain, she would empathize as a fellow Christian. She told me she just wanted to help.
Her idea of helping was to share my confidences with others. She enlisted another member of my class, a real estate agent, to sell my house even though I had told her I did not want to sell. She did all this without asking me. The first I knew was a phone call telling me that the agent would call to set up a time to sell my home. I collapsed emotionally. I told the agent I could not see him. I stopped going to Sunday School. Only Sweets stood between me and suicide.
Sweets managed to help me through the darkness, seeing me on a stepped up schedule.. He was more appalled than I was at the lack of integrity by the class member/social worker. Sweets is a Christian, but not a Baptist. He helped me work through how Christians could act so badly and abandon you so completely. He did not urge me to return to that class, but he did not tell me to leave the class. He should not have had to. I should have known when I was given the list of food pantries that I did not belong there. I was stupid. I could not face the reality that my "friends" believed I was a sinner who did not deserve help.
After several weeks, I returned to class. I said nothing to anyone about the hurt I had experienced. I should have. Sweets says that is an issue we have to work on. I just didn't want to be alone.
The class had changed. Now Southern Baptists dominated it. The members railed against the minister and staff because they did not espouse the conservative Baptist beliefs. The class was caught up in intercessory prayer. They were all becoming "prayer warriors" I stopped going because the class just made me sad. No one ever asked how things were going for me. No one ever asked about my depression. I never mentioned it either.
Finally, I had a financial crisis. There was one member of the class that I had known from before we started the church. He had been through something financially similar to my problems. I thought he would understand and when I called, he seemed to. He agreed to keep everything confidential. We had several conversations and email exchanges. He told me he had a plan to help me and I believed him. I received an email to the whole class in which he told them what he was doing and what I had confided. There went confidentiality.
He did have a plan: tell me in an email about all my failings, how I had procrastinated and that there was little hope for a good outcome. I would lose my home and not get anything from the equity. I received the email at eleven at night. At two, I was preparing to kill myself.
I remembered what my pastor( he's gone now) had said once about suicide years before I ever contemplated suicide. He said you can always do it the next day. Wait. So I did. I sent the email my "friend" had sent me to my cousin with a brief explanation of the circumstance. The next day my cousin was there, caring and helping. I saw Sweets two days later. I gave him all the emails I had between my "friend" and I. Sweets was appalled and disgusted with my "friend." Sweets reminded me that I could call him for help anytime. There is always someone on call.
Nothing has improved much, but I am hanging in there. I will almost certainly lose my home. My friends are all tired of my problems. I pray, but still feel alone. My dreams are ashes. I have no one. My cousin has had a tragedy in her family and financial setbacks because of the economy. I do know why the Sunday School class has shunned me. The tip-off was in that last email.
A true believer would not be depressed. Depression is a sign that you are weak and a sinner. If you were in tune with God, you could pray yourself out of such a mood. While the Sunday School class believes that, I do not. I know about mental illness because my mother was schizophrenic. Her church turned her away when she had a psychotic break. I am stunned that fifty years later mine has shunned me. Sweets assures me I am not psychotic, "just" depressed. I think he knows that a child of someone with severe mental illness always worries about that.
There is one final chapter. After Christmas, I received an email sent to all members of the class. I am still on the email list. In it, the class thanked the "friend" I had asked for help for all the aid he had given to someone else in our church. The email went into detail about their prayers for this man, how much money the class had raised for him ($10,000+), and about the vehicle purchased for him as well as the other assistance given. I would be the first to tell you that this man deserved all the help he received and I would not begrudge him one penny. My question is why my Sunday School class never thought I deserved help during my year of struggle. I would have been happy with their prayers.
Sweets told me I should be angry. He wants me to write a letter to the class. I am not sure I can. Sweets says that is what we work on next.
I did remember what my pastor said referring to how a Baptist church had kicked out of the congregation a recovering alcoholic. "Baptists shoot their wounded."
First, some background. Over a year ago, I was extremely depressed, so I did what seemed the only logical thing to do: I tried to kill myself. I only failed because a friend found me in time and got me to the hospital. My suicide attempt may have been a side effect of a painkiller that I was taking because a bone in my leg was dying or a result of the depression. My friends all want the attempt to be from the painkiller. Since I still have suicidal thoughts I am not so sure the painkiller was the problem. Certainly, it did not help. My life had collapsed around me, I won't go into details, just say they were financial, emotional, and spiritual.
The dying bone has been replaced by metal. I take a powerful anti-depressant. I see Sweets at least monthly. I still find the desire to kill myself there most of the time. For a while, I had reached the point where I wanted to die, but not to kill myself, but my Baptist friends have sent me back to daily suicide contemplation. I just see no point to my life. I still believe in God, but I have doubts that the individual's fate in this world matters in God's grand scheme. I have no doubt that I will go to heaven and I would rather be there than here.
I belong to a moderate Baptist church and have attended the same Sunday School class for over twenty years. I thought I was part of that group. I was the most liberal member of the class, but my opinions had always been welcomed and I thought, respected.
The class responded wonderfully to my bone surgery and recuperation. They bought my groceries for more that two months as I recovered from the surgery. Of course, I battled the depression and a few friends and a cousin kept a close eye on me. No one from my class ever mentioned it, even though I had not kept my problem a secret. When my recuperation from the surgery was complete, I received a shock. My help stopped. I was told that the class would do no more and handed a list of food pantries. I was so grateful, but stunned at the abrupt withdrawal of support. I was working some, but not bringing in enough to support myself or my cats. I believe the fact that I owned a bunch of cats contributed to the desire not to help me. I was worse off than when I attempted suicide in every way but physical pain.
I saw no way to take care of myself or my cats. I decided that suicide was still the only answer to my emotional and financial pain. I would take steps to make sure I was not found in time. I have never felt so alone in my whole life.
A friend called and asked me to lunch. I don't know what she said at that lunch, but I broke down and told her how bad my circumstances were. I did not tell her that I was planning suicide. She responded magnificently, giving me enough money to get on my feet and pay my income tax. She has continued to be there for me. The irony is she is an ex-Mormon who attends no church. My Baptist friends did not even ask how I was doing.
A member of my class did call and said she wanted to help. She was a trained social worker and said she had contacts that could help. She promised me that anything I told her would be kept in confidence. She lied.
I told way too much about what was going on in my life including a brief synopsis of my childhood. What a fool I was. I thought if I shared my pain, she would empathize as a fellow Christian. She told me she just wanted to help.
Her idea of helping was to share my confidences with others. She enlisted another member of my class, a real estate agent, to sell my house even though I had told her I did not want to sell. She did all this without asking me. The first I knew was a phone call telling me that the agent would call to set up a time to sell my home. I collapsed emotionally. I told the agent I could not see him. I stopped going to Sunday School. Only Sweets stood between me and suicide.
Sweets managed to help me through the darkness, seeing me on a stepped up schedule.. He was more appalled than I was at the lack of integrity by the class member/social worker. Sweets is a Christian, but not a Baptist. He helped me work through how Christians could act so badly and abandon you so completely. He did not urge me to return to that class, but he did not tell me to leave the class. He should not have had to. I should have known when I was given the list of food pantries that I did not belong there. I was stupid. I could not face the reality that my "friends" believed I was a sinner who did not deserve help.
After several weeks, I returned to class. I said nothing to anyone about the hurt I had experienced. I should have. Sweets says that is an issue we have to work on. I just didn't want to be alone.
The class had changed. Now Southern Baptists dominated it. The members railed against the minister and staff because they did not espouse the conservative Baptist beliefs. The class was caught up in intercessory prayer. They were all becoming "prayer warriors" I stopped going because the class just made me sad. No one ever asked how things were going for me. No one ever asked about my depression. I never mentioned it either.
Finally, I had a financial crisis. There was one member of the class that I had known from before we started the church. He had been through something financially similar to my problems. I thought he would understand and when I called, he seemed to. He agreed to keep everything confidential. We had several conversations and email exchanges. He told me he had a plan to help me and I believed him. I received an email to the whole class in which he told them what he was doing and what I had confided. There went confidentiality.
He did have a plan: tell me in an email about all my failings, how I had procrastinated and that there was little hope for a good outcome. I would lose my home and not get anything from the equity. I received the email at eleven at night. At two, I was preparing to kill myself.
I remembered what my pastor( he's gone now) had said once about suicide years before I ever contemplated suicide. He said you can always do it the next day. Wait. So I did. I sent the email my "friend" had sent me to my cousin with a brief explanation of the circumstance. The next day my cousin was there, caring and helping. I saw Sweets two days later. I gave him all the emails I had between my "friend" and I. Sweets was appalled and disgusted with my "friend." Sweets reminded me that I could call him for help anytime. There is always someone on call.
Nothing has improved much, but I am hanging in there. I will almost certainly lose my home. My friends are all tired of my problems. I pray, but still feel alone. My dreams are ashes. I have no one. My cousin has had a tragedy in her family and financial setbacks because of the economy. I do know why the Sunday School class has shunned me. The tip-off was in that last email.
A true believer would not be depressed. Depression is a sign that you are weak and a sinner. If you were in tune with God, you could pray yourself out of such a mood. While the Sunday School class believes that, I do not. I know about mental illness because my mother was schizophrenic. Her church turned her away when she had a psychotic break. I am stunned that fifty years later mine has shunned me. Sweets assures me I am not psychotic, "just" depressed. I think he knows that a child of someone with severe mental illness always worries about that.
There is one final chapter. After Christmas, I received an email sent to all members of the class. I am still on the email list. In it, the class thanked the "friend" I had asked for help for all the aid he had given to someone else in our church. The email went into detail about their prayers for this man, how much money the class had raised for him ($10,000+), and about the vehicle purchased for him as well as the other assistance given. I would be the first to tell you that this man deserved all the help he received and I would not begrudge him one penny. My question is why my Sunday School class never thought I deserved help during my year of struggle. I would have been happy with their prayers.
Sweets told me I should be angry. He wants me to write a letter to the class. I am not sure I can. Sweets says that is what we work on next.
I did remember what my pastor said referring to how a Baptist church had kicked out of the congregation a recovering alcoholic. "Baptists shoot their wounded."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)